Home/Compare/United Kingdom vs United States · $100,000#CMP-13116
ParametersFromUnited KingdomToUnited StatesGross$100,000FilingSinglePeriodFY 2026
Residency model
Edit parameters →
§ 01 · The verdict

United States leaves you with $21,535 more per year — a 30.4% net advantage over United Kingdom on a $100,000 gross.

Most of the gap is opened by United States's Foreign Earned Income Exclusion regime, which displaces the standard schedule. Both countries are indicated in USD at the displayed FX.

Net delta · annual
+$21,535
in favour of United States
Monthly
+$1,795
Over 5 yrs
+$107,674
Rate gap
21.5 pp
Confidence
High

United Kingdom taxes residents on worldwide income, while United States taxes its citizens on worldwide income regardless of residence — a structural difference that shapes how each country treats foreign-source income. United Kingdom's top marginal rate of 45% is 8 percentage points above United States's 37%, making the statutory gap one of the largest variables in this comparison. United States uses a fixed 183-day threshold for residency; United Kingdom relies on a multi-factor test with no single day-count trigger.

GB·LondonGBP → USD @ 1.2658

United Kingdom

Standard tax (no special regime)
Effective tax rate
29.2%
on $100,000 gross
Net take-home
$70,815
$5,901 / month
Statutory deductionsUSD
Personal income tax
progressive · top 45%
$24,091
Social security
8.0% employee · capped
$5,094
Total deductions$29,185
Gross income$100,000
Net take-home$70,815
US·New YorkUSD · base currency

United States

Foreign Earned Income Exclusion
Effective tax rate
7.6%
on $100,000 gross
Net take-home
$92,350
$7,696 / month
Statutory deductionsUSD
Personal income tax
feie · 0% flat
Social security
22.9% employee · capped
$7,650
Total deductions$7,650
Gross income$100,000
Net take-home$92,350
§ 02 · Where the paycheck goes

Flow of $100,000.

Width of each segment is its share of gross. NET segment is what crosses the finish line into the user's account.
United Kingdom29.2% effective
$0 → $100,000
PIT · $24,091
NET · $70,815
United States7.6% effective
$0 → $100,000
NET · $92,350
Income tax (PIT)Social chargeNet take-home
Δ net+$21,535·30.4% advantage UN
Who saves more

On a $100k single-resident employment profile under each country's default schedule, United States produces the lower effective burden at 24.4% versus 29.2% in United Kingdom — a 4.8 percentage-point gap that compounds to roughly $4,823 of additional take-home annually. The 8-point spread in top statutory rates is the primary driver; above their respective thresholds, each additional dollar is taxed at 45% in United Kingdom but only 37% in United States.

§ 03 · Full ledger

Line-item reconciliation.

All amounts USD · FY2026
InstrumentUnited Kingdom · USDUnited States · USDΔ (US − GB)
I. Personal income tax
Personal income tax
GBprogressive · top 45%USfeie · 0% flat
$24,091−$24,091
subtotal · personal income tax$24,091$0−$24,091
II. Mandatory social security & health
NI Class 1: 8% on £242-£967/wk; 2% above (cap modeled at primary upper earnings limit).
GB8.0% · capped £50,300US7.6% · capped $184,500
$5,094$7,650+$2,556
SECA: both employer + employee portions paid by SE.
GBUS15.3% · capped $184,500
subtotal · mandatory social security & health$5,094$7,650+$2,556
Total deductions$29,185$7,650−$21,535
Effective rate29.2%7.6%-21.5 pp
Gross income$100,000$100,000
Net take-home$70,815$92,350+$21,535
Table 1 · Statutory deductions, single-filer remote worker, FY2026 indicative. All amounts in USD. n/a where instrument does not apply.
Special regimes

Both countries offer dedicated regimes for incoming professionals: United Kingdom's FIG (Foreign Income and Gains) and United States's Foreign Earned Income Exclusion (0% flat).

Bottom line for digital nomads

For a digital nomad or remote worker on a $100k income, United States edges United Kingdom by 4.8 percentage points on the default schedule — a real but not overwhelming difference that other variables may offset. United Kingdom taxes residents on worldwide income, so the headline effective rate applies to total global earnings — not just locally-sourced pay.

§ 05 · Methodology & sources

How this comparison was built.

Every line above can be traced to a primary instrument. We publish the model; you may toggle its parameters.

Read the full note ↗
United Kingdom · source instruments
  • Personal income tax code · brackets 2026
  • Social-insurance contribution schedule 2026
  • FIG (Foreign Income and Gains) · New 4-year regime for arrivals from April 2025 (non-dom reg…
United States · source instruments
  • Personal income tax code · brackets 2026
  • Social-insurance contribution schedule 2026
  • Foreign Earned Income Exclusion · US citizen/resident living abroad; Physical Presence (330 d…
Model assumptions
  • 01.Single filer, no dependents. Joint and head-of-household calculations not yet modeled.
  • 02.Income treated as employment, not self-employed unless explicitly set.
  • 03.Special regimes assumed eligible where the headline criteria fit; otherwise the standard schedule applies.
  • 04.FX held constant at the displayed static rate across the period.
  • 05.No equity, RSU, capital gains, or carried interest.
  • 06.No treaty offsets applied — see HOME model for the US-resident case.
  • 07.Filing status assumed Single. Joint and head-of-household calculations not yet modeled.
  • 08.Tax year 2026 with 2025 transitional rates where applicable.
Last refreshed · Sun, 05 Jul 2026 20:49:54 GMT
Engine v0.1.0
Confidence · Verify (GB), High (US)
Disclaimer — Comparely publishes modelled estimates for informational purposes and does not constitute legal, tax, accounting, or immigration advice. Statutory rates, social-charge ceilings, FX, and elective regimes change. Eligibility for any special regime is subject to qualifying conditions beyond income alone. Consult a qualified adviser before acting on any figure displayed.