Home/Compare/Australia vs United States · $100,000#CMP-53749
ParametersFromAustraliaToUnited StatesGross$100,000FilingSinglePeriodFY 2026
Residency model
Edit parameters →
§ 01 · The verdict

United States leaves you with $19,072 more per year — a 26.0% net advantage over Australia on a $100,000 gross.

Most of the gap is opened by United States's Foreign Earned Income Exclusion regime, which displaces the standard schedule. Both countries are indicated in USD at the displayed FX.

Net delta · annual
+$19,072
in favour of United States
Monthly
+$1,589
Over 5 yrs
+$95,362
Rate gap
19.1 pp
Confidence
High

Australia taxes residents on worldwide income, while United States taxes its citizens on worldwide income regardless of residence — a structural difference that shapes how each country treats foreign-source income. Australia's top marginal rate of 45% is 8 percentage points above United States's 37%, making the statutory gap one of the largest variables in this comparison.

AU·SydneyAUD → USD @ 0.6579

Australia

Standard tax (no special regime)
Effective tax rate
26.7%
on $100,000 gross
Net take-home
$73,278
$6,106 / month
Statutory deductionsUSD
Personal income tax
progressive · top 45%
$24,722
Social security
2.0% employee · uncapped
$2,000
Total deductions$26,722
Gross income$100,000
Net take-home$73,278
US·New YorkUSD · base currency

United States

Foreign Earned Income Exclusion
Effective tax rate
7.6%
on $100,000 gross
Net take-home
$92,350
$7,696 / month
Statutory deductionsUSD
Personal income tax
feie · 0% flat
Social security
22.9% employee · capped
$7,650
Total deductions$7,650
Gross income$100,000
Net take-home$92,350
§ 02 · Where the paycheck goes

Flow of $100,000.

Width of each segment is its share of gross. NET segment is what crosses the finish line into the user's account.
Australia26.7% effective
$0 → $100,000
PIT · $24,722
NET · $73,278
United States7.6% effective
$0 → $100,000
NET · $92,350
Income tax (PIT)Social chargeNet take-home
Δ net+$19,072·26.0% advantage UN
Who saves more

On a $100k single-resident employment profile under each country's default schedule, United States produces the lower effective burden at 24.4% versus 26.7% in Australia — a 2.4 percentage-point gap that compounds to roughly $2,360 of additional take-home annually. The 8-point spread in top statutory rates is the primary driver; above their respective thresholds, each additional dollar is taxed at 45% in Australia but only 37% in United States. Social-security contributions also differ: United States charges 7.6% versus 2.0% in Australia, adding a second layer to the effective-rate spread that doesn't show in the income-tax brackets alone.

§ 03 · Full ledger

Line-item reconciliation.

All amounts USD · FY2026
InstrumentAustralia · USDUnited States · USDΔ (US − AU)
I. Personal income tax
Personal income tax
AUprogressive · top 45%USfeie · 0% flat
$24,722−$24,722
subtotal · personal income tax$24,722$0−$24,722
II. Mandatory social security & health
Medicare Levy +2% of taxable income. Superannuation is employer-paid.
AU2.0% · uncappedUS
$2,000−$2,000
FICA 6.2% SS (cap $184,500) + 1.45% Medicare (uncapped). Additional 0.9% Medicare above $200k not modeled.
AUUS7.6% · capped $184,500
$7,650+$7,650
SECA: both employer + employee portions paid by SE.
AUUS15.3% · capped $184,500
subtotal · mandatory social security & health$2,000$7,650+$5,650
Total deductions$26,722$7,650−$19,072
Effective rate26.7%7.6%-19.1 pp
Gross income$100,000$100,000
Net take-home$73,278$92,350+$19,072
Table 1 · Statutory deductions, single-filer remote worker, FY2026 indicative. All amounts in USD. n/a where instrument does not apply.
Special regimes

United States offers the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion (flat 0% on qualifying income) for qualifying incoming residents; Australia has no equivalent ICP-targeted regime currently modelled — new residents there enter the standard Australia schedule immediately. For movers who don't qualify for United States's Foreign Earned Income Exclusion, both countries revert to their default progressive schedules, where Australia's lower top rate still gives it a structural edge.

Bottom line for digital nomads

For a digital nomad or remote worker on a $100k income, United States edges Australia by 2.4 percentage points on the default schedule — a real but not overwhelming difference that other variables may offset. Australia taxes residents on worldwide income, so the headline effective rate applies to total global earnings — not just locally-sourced pay.

§ 05 · Methodology & sources

How this comparison was built.

Every line above can be traced to a primary instrument. We publish the model; you may toggle its parameters.

Read the full note ↗
Australia · source instruments
  • Personal income tax code · brackets 2026
  • Social-insurance contribution schedule 2026
  • No special regimes recorded for this jurisdiction.
United States · source instruments
  • Personal income tax code · brackets 2026
  • Social-insurance contribution schedule 2026
  • Foreign Earned Income Exclusion · US citizen/resident living abroad; Physical Presence (330 d…
Model assumptions
  • 01.Single filer, no dependents. Joint and head-of-household calculations not yet modeled.
  • 02.Income treated as employment, not self-employed unless explicitly set.
  • 03.Special regimes assumed eligible where the headline criteria fit; otherwise the standard schedule applies.
  • 04.FX held constant at the displayed static rate across the period.
  • 05.No equity, RSU, capital gains, or carried interest.
  • 06.No treaty offsets applied — see HOME model for the US-resident case.
  • 07.Filing status assumed Single. Joint and head-of-household calculations not yet modeled.
  • 08.Tax year 2026 with 2025 transitional rates where applicable.
Last refreshed · Sun, 05 Jul 2026 19:48:35 GMT
Engine v0.1.0
Confidence · High (AU), High (US)
Disclaimer — Comparely publishes modelled estimates for informational purposes and does not constitute legal, tax, accounting, or immigration advice. Statutory rates, social-charge ceilings, FX, and elective regimes change. Eligibility for any special regime is subject to qualifying conditions beyond income alone. Consult a qualified adviser before acting on any figure displayed.