Home/Compare/Panama vs United States · $100,000#CMP-00562
ParametersFromPanamaToUnited StatesGross$100,000FilingSinglePeriodFY 2026
Residency model
Edit parameters →
§ 01 · The verdict

United States leaves you with $20,450 more per year — a 28.4% net advantage over Panama on a $100,000 gross.

Most of the gap is opened by United States's Foreign Earned Income Exclusion regime, which displaces the standard schedule. Both countries are indicated in USD at the displayed FX.

Net delta · annual
+$20,450
in favour of United States
Monthly
+$1,704
Over 5 yrs
+$102,250
Rate gap
20.5 pp
Confidence
High

Panama uses a territorial system — only locally-sourced income enters the tax base, while United States taxes its citizens on worldwide income regardless of residence — a structural difference that shapes how each country treats foreign-source income. United States's top marginal rate of 37% is 12 percentage points above Panama's 25%, making the statutory gap one of the largest variables in this comparison.

PA·Panama CityUSD · base currency

Panama

Standard tax (no special regime)
Effective tax rate
28.1%
on $100,000 gross
Net take-home
$71,900
$5,992 / month
Statutory deductionsUSD
Personal income tax
progressive · top 25%
$18,350
Social security
9.8% employee · uncapped
$9,750
Total deductions$28,100
Gross income$100,000
Net take-home$71,900
US·New YorkUSD · base currency

United States

Foreign Earned Income Exclusion
Effective tax rate
7.6%
on $100,000 gross
Net take-home
$92,350
$7,696 / month
Statutory deductionsUSD
Personal income tax
feie · 0% flat
Social security
22.9% employee · capped
$7,650
Total deductions$7,650
Gross income$100,000
Net take-home$92,350
§ 02 · Where the paycheck goes

Flow of $100,000.

Width of each segment is its share of gross. NET segment is what crosses the finish line into the user's account.
Panama28.1% effective
$0 → $100,000
PIT · $18,350
Social · $9,750
NET · $71,900
United States7.6% effective
$0 → $100,000
NET · $92,350
Income tax (PIT)Social chargeNet take-home
Δ net+$20,450·28.4% advantage UN
Who saves more

On a $100k single-resident employment profile under each country's default schedule, United States produces the lower effective burden at 24.4% versus 28.1% in Panama — a 3.7 percentage-point gap that compounds to roughly $3,738 of additional take-home annually. The 12-point spread in top statutory rates is the primary driver; above their respective thresholds, each additional dollar is taxed at 37% in United States but only 25% in Panama.

§ 03 · Full ledger

Line-item reconciliation.

All amounts USD · FY2026
InstrumentPanama · USDUnited States · USDΔ (US − PA)
I. Personal income tax
Personal income tax
PAprogressive · top 25%USfeie · 0% flat
$18,350−$18,350
subtotal · personal income tax$18,350$0−$18,350
II. Mandatory social security & health
~9.75%.
PA9.8% · uncappedUS7.6% · capped $184,500
$9,750$7,650−$2,100
SECA: both employer + employee portions paid by SE.
PAUS15.3% · capped $184,500
subtotal · mandatory social security & health$9,750$7,650−$2,100
Total deductions$28,100$7,650−$20,450
Effective rate28.1%7.6%-20.5 pp
Gross income$100,000$100,000
Net take-home$71,900$92,350+$20,450
Table 1 · Statutory deductions, single-filer remote worker, FY2026 indicative. All amounts in USD. n/a where instrument does not apply.
Special regimes

United States offers the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion (flat 0% on qualifying income) for qualifying incoming residents; Panama has no equivalent ICP-targeted regime currently modelled — new residents there enter the standard Panama schedule immediately. For movers who don't qualify for United States's Foreign Earned Income Exclusion, both countries revert to their default progressive schedules, where Panama's lower top rate still gives it a structural edge.

Bottom line for digital nomads

For a digital nomad or remote worker on a $100k income, United States edges Panama by 3.7 percentage points on the default schedule — a real but not overwhelming difference that other variables may offset. Panama's territorial system means foreign-source income stays off the resident tax base entirely — a structural advantage for nomads paid by overseas clients that no rate comparison fully captures.

§ 05 · Methodology & sources

How this comparison was built.

Every line above can be traced to a primary instrument. We publish the model; you may toggle its parameters.

Read the full note ↗
Panama · source instruments
  • Personal income tax code · brackets 2026
  • Social-insurance contribution schedule 2026
  • No special regimes recorded for this jurisdiction.
United States · source instruments
  • Personal income tax code · brackets 2026
  • Social-insurance contribution schedule 2026
  • Foreign Earned Income Exclusion · US citizen/resident living abroad; Physical Presence (330 d…
Model assumptions
  • 01.Single filer, no dependents. Joint and head-of-household calculations not yet modeled.
  • 02.Income treated as employment, not self-employed unless explicitly set.
  • 03.Special regimes assumed eligible where the headline criteria fit; otherwise the standard schedule applies.
  • 04.FX held constant at the displayed static rate across the period.
  • 05.No equity, RSU, capital gains, or carried interest.
  • 06.No treaty offsets applied — see HOME model for the US-resident case.
  • 07.Filing status assumed Single. Joint and head-of-household calculations not yet modeled.
  • 08.Tax year 2026 with 2025 transitional rates where applicable.
Last refreshed · Sun, 05 Jul 2026 19:50:10 GMT
Engine v0.1.0
Confidence · High (PA), High (US)
Disclaimer — Comparely publishes modelled estimates for informational purposes and does not constitute legal, tax, accounting, or immigration advice. Statutory rates, social-charge ceilings, FX, and elective regimes change. Eligibility for any special regime is subject to qualifying conditions beyond income alone. Consult a qualified adviser before acting on any figure displayed.